Headings
Subheadings
Visuals
KWL
Details and
Plausible Inferences
Techinal Terms
Topic of the text:
The comparison of students' academic performance and preferences for online vs. face-to-face learning methods.
​
Writer’s opinion about the text’s topic:
The writer believes that both online and face-to-face learning methods can be equally effective for academic performance, but students tend to prefer face-to-face learning for activities that require interaction, such as discussions.
​
Support for writer’s opinion (e.g., evidence such as facts, testimonies, examples, etc.):
Evidence: The study found no significant differences in test performance between online and face-to-face learning.
​
Testimony/Example: Students preferred in-class activities, especially for discussions, due to higher engagement, immediate feedback, and better conversation flow.
​
Fact: The text mentions that students appreciated the flexibility of online learning but noted that it didn't provide the same level of engagement as face-to-face interactions.
Rhetorical Questions
What credentials does the author have which give him/her the authority to write about the topic of the text?
​
Nenagh Kemp and Rachel Grieve are researchers in the field of education, specifically focusing on learning and teaching methods. Their research includes studying students' academic performance and preferences for online versus in-person learning. Their academic background and research experience in education give them the authority to write about the effectiveness of different learning methods.
After considering the author’s profession and affiliation, what possible biases the author might have about the topic?
The author might think both online and in-person learning are useful because the research showed no clear winner. The author might also believe that both methods can be good for different reasons, based on their experience in teaching.
What is the purpose of the text, and how does the author accomplish that purpose? What evidence does the author use to support the main idea in the text?
The purpose of the text is to show whether students do better in online or in-person learning. The author shares results from two studies, showing that students' test scores were the same no matter the method. The author uses test results and students' feedback to support the idea that both learning methods can be good.
What specific idea/information in the text challenges or surprises you? Why?
It was surprising that students’ preferences didn’t affect their test scores. This challenges the idea that students should always learn in the way they like best. It shows that students can do well even in the learning method they don’t prefer.
Is the style of writing suitable for the intended audience? Is it too formal or too casual? Why?
The writing is formal, but not too difficult to understand. It’s perfect for high school or college students because it explains things clearly and uses some research results. The style is just right for people who want to learn about how different learning methods work.